![]() I still don’t believe it’s worth the current $120 going price, however. When it’s all said and done, I am impressed with the Ultra Vision overall and believe its quality is top notch. You won’t want to be creating 10 minute long videos that often though. Still, in this day of broadband, this is not such a big deal. So, recording a 30s video would result in a 7.5MB file, or 15MB for an entire minute. ![]() The downside though is that these videos get big rather quick, an average of 250KB per second. Waving, doing jumping jacks or other similar activities will not result in much of a blur. At its peak, it records around 15 frames per second, so really you will not notice lag unless you are moving -real- fast. I expected a very laggy experience, but that wasn’t the case. However, for personal videos that you can later send to friends, the camera supports up to 960×720 which had quite the impressive result. So, for fun photographs, this is a great solution, but don’t rely on it for the best color representation or crispest images available.Īs I mentioned, 640*480 is the maximum supported via live chat, which makes sense since these videos rack up in the megabytes quick. There’s no way the 10MP images represent the same quality of a D-SLR. Imagine a point-and-shoot camera that supports 10MP images. However, -anything- over 1.3 Megapixels is falsely enlarged and looks absolutely horrid. Live video chat is supported up to 640*480 while images can be snapped all the way up into the 4 Megapixel range. While I will -never- be satisfied with the image quality from a webcam, there’s no doubt that this one is really the cream of the crop. No, I haven’t been a huge member of the webcam club in recent years, but the Ultra Vision impressed me. Up to this point, I haven’t really given my thoughts on the performance/image quality/video quality, so allow me to do that now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |